| THE earliest recorded maker of 
				decorative Tunbridge Ware was named Jordon, very little is known 
				about him, except that he established workshops in 1685, and his 
				work became so well known and sought after that by 1700 
				marquetry work on a small scale was being produced in London 
				under the name of Tunbridge Ware. Decorative Tunbridge Ware falls into 
				three categories: (1) From the 1680s to 1850s Tunbridge 
				Ware was decorated with Marquetry and Parquetry. (2) From about 1730 until the 1890s 
				Turnery work which was known as stickwork. (3) From the 1830s for about 50 years 
				Tunbridge Ware was decorated with wood mosaic. Marquetry and Parquetry all 
				Marquetarians are familiar with, though the writer has never 
				seen any evidence that pictorial marquetry was used for 
				decorating, but mainly simple scroll work. Parquetry being much 
				more in evidence, and it was this type of decorative work which 
				prompted the development of mosaics. Stickwork was apparently known as inlaid 
				turnery, but in fact no inlay was used, it did in fact consist 
				of various coloured fillets of wood being glued together so that 
				a variegated block was formed, and these were turned or shaped, 
				producing many varying and pleasing patterns. A form of this 
				work on a larger scale can be purchased today in the form of 
				fruit plates and bowls. Wood mosaics. This is the term now 
				usually applied to Tunbridge Ware and is known as Mosaic 
				Tunbridge Ware. In the late 1820s one James Burrows 
				(whose family had taken over the business of Jordon about 1740) 
				developed the mosaic ware and devised a method whereby a number 
				of identical patterns could be cut from one prepared block which 
				could then be applied to decorate articles of white wood, 
				usually seasoned pine. In 1840 G. & J. Burrows advertised as 
				follows: Inventors of the mosaic Inlaid Ware, Manufacturers of 
				Tunbridge Ware, and Inlaid Turnery of the newest inventions. The early patterns were simple and 
				usually consisted of geometrical patterns, and these could be 
				cut and laid side by side to form a strip or square of patterns 
				on a box or similar article. Sometime later one of Burrows 
				apprentices left his employ and passed on his knowledge to 
				George Wise, a cabinet maker in Tonbridge, who started a rival 
				firm for the manufacture of mosaic Tunbridge Ware. The 
				manufacture of mosaic ware was also started by a firm " Fenner 
				and Nye " who in 1834 advertised drastic price reductions as 
				they had installed mechanical driven machinery; this firm was 
				later carried on alone by Edmund Nye, a relative of the original 
				Nye, and it appears that around 1836 Thomas Barton, aged 17 
				years, an apprentice of the Wise family, joined Edmund Nye's 
				factory, and he is credited with considerably raising the 
				standard of the craft. At the Great Exhibition of 1851 Edmund 
				Nye exhibited several pieces of hand placed mosaic work, and 
				according to the book " Mansions, Men and Tunbridge Ware " by 
				Younghusband the design of the piece which was awarded a gold 
				medal is attributed to Thomas Barton; this was a chromotrope 
				table, a mosaic of North American birds composed of 129,500 
				pieces in which 33 different natural coloured woods were used. Around this period was considered to be 
				the time during which the best work was carried out. Whether Thomas Barton was related to 
				John Barton who established workshops in Tunbridge Wells late in 
				the reign of George the 1st is not known, to the writer. 
				However, to John Barton is attributed the invention of a 
				circular saw for the cutting of veneers for the Tunbridge Ware 
				trade. The demand for mosaic Tunbridge Ware 
				increased, and strangely enough this was the reason for its 
				ultimate demise, for with the increase of demand the production 
				was speeded up, more and more machinery being used, with the 
				result that the individual craftsmen began to lose interest, and 
				in many cases even the polishing, which had been considered very 
				high class, was given over to a spirit varnish, with the result 
				all individuality vanished and the wares looked what in fact 
				they were, a mass produced article and visitors ceased to 
				purchase, and slowly but surely the manufacture of mosaic ware 
				died out, and according to records the last business closed down 
				sometime in the 1880s. In the 1920s considerable quantities of 
				mosaic work were reproduced by the Tunbridge Wells Manufacturing 
				Company Ltd., in traditional shapes and patterns, and it would 
				probably be safe to say that nothing elaborate was undertaken; 
				no doubt there are people who will still remember this attempt 
				to revive the craft. The Marquetry work of Tunbridge Wells 
				achieved celebrity during the reign of William and Mary, for 
				towards the end of the 17th century the term Tunbridge Ware had 
				been adopted by specialists of this work in London. Several 
				examples of Marquetry, Parquetry and Mosaic ware can be seen in 
				the Victoria and Albert Museum, and a games table made at 
				Tunbridge Wells in 1845 for the Prince Consort and decorated 
				with mosaic is in Kensington Palace. Probably the finest collections of 
				Tunbridge Ware can be seen in the "Pinto" collections at Oxey 
				House, Oxey, Boreham Wood, and in the Museum at Tunbridge Wells. Her Majesty Queen Mary was a collector 
				of Tunbridge Ware, and when visiting Tunbridge Wells, visited an 
				exhibition of the ware, designs uncut blocks, tools and plates, 
				which an antique dealer of Tunbridge Wells had purchased, all of 
				which came from the works of Mr. Thomas Barton. The foregoing is of necessity only a 
				brief history of the craft and most of what follows concerns the 
				ware known as Mosaic Tunbridge Ware. First, of course, the pattern or picture 
				was prepared, usually from water colour designs in the case of a 
				picture, and this was followed by the preparation of a chart. 
				Squared paper was used for this usually 10 squares to the inch. 
				Each square was marked with a numeral which indicated the wood 
				and its colour until the picture or pattern was represented by 
				different woods to be used by the band maker. Each square on the 
				paper would, of course, represent one piece of wood of the size 
				to be used, so that if a pattern was to be built up of 1/16 
				mosaics and was 1 inch square 16 x 16 squares would be marked in 
				and likewise a pattern to be built up of 1/32 mosaics, 1 inch 
				square, 32 x 32 squares would be marked in. If a picture of, 
				say, 6 x 4 is to be built up using 1/32 mosaics then 192 x 128 
				squares would be marked and this means the water colour picture 
				being copied would be 19.2 inches x 12.8 inches which would 
				represent 192 x 128 squares in the squared paper. From this it 
				can be seen that the smaller the mosaics to be used the larger 
				must be the picture being copied. On completion the chart was passed to 
				the bandmaker who proceeded to follow the chart's instructions. 
				Let us assume that the chart to be followed consists of 1/16 
				mosaics the finished pattern 1 inch square and remember that the 
				end grain is what will finally represent the finished pattern or 
				picture. Let us take a simple pattern using only 
				five different toned woods which will be represented in the 
				absence of colour as follows (please note that our web version 
				is in colour as you can see!) : |